Shareholder grievances are at the focal of Fareya Azfar’s corporate disputes practice expertise. The firm has acted both for minority shareholders who are being marginalized in their companies, and for companies who face the threat of minority shareholder action.
Shareholders may be protected by the contractual terms of their shareholder’s agreement. If you have a shareholders agreement, the procedure for resolving disputes will be clear and known to shareholders. In that case, the dispute may be managed early, hopefully without the need for court proceedings.
Besides the contractual protections under the shareholders’ agreement or articles of association, a shareholder with cause to believe that the directors and other shareholders have acted in a manner which is unfairly prejudicial to (at least) some shareholders, or have acted in a manner which devalues his shares has many statutory protections which provide a vast array of remedies.
We have represented minority shareholders to pursue their statutory rights and claim protections in the following instances:
- not invited to general meetings or otherwise squeezed out of management anticipation
- allotments of share For no discernible purpose or otherwise resulting in unfair dilution of minority share value
- a failure to consult the complainant or to provide information;
- misappropriation of company business or assets;
- mismanagement of internal company affairs;
- failure to pay reasonable dividends.
There is no prescribed list of actions or omissions that, by definition, amount to unfair prejudice. Both prejudice and unfairness must be evidenced. We take cognizance of the facts and circumstances of each case, establishing and evidencing the conduct complained.Shareholders rights is a complex area, and shareholders and potential claimants need to consider the facts of any particular case carefully. The facts and circumstances of the case will always prescribe the choice of action which an aggrieved shareholder may bring.
―it would be impossible and wholly undesirable to define the circumstances in which the application of equitable principles might make it unjust or inequitable (or unfair) for a party to insist on legal rights or to exercise them in a particular way ― Lord Hoffmann in O‘Neill vs Phillips, (1999) 2 BCLC 1
The remedy that is most often sought is that the other shareholders buy their shares for a fair value.
Courts have the power to impose upon the parties to a dispute whatever settlement the court considers just and equitable. This discretion is deliberately unfettered for it allows the Courts to order the remedy which circumstances so warrant.
Traditionally perceived as being about compensating shareholders for infringements of their rights or for losses they suffered as a result of negligent behaviour by the company and its directors, but for a long time now, an additional function of shareholder litigation has been put forward: to deter managerial misconduct. This is where our firm excels.
- How it works
‘shareholder litigation’ comprises all civil actions brought by shareholders against managerial wrongdoings within companies in order to recover economic losses caused by them.. The firm has acted both for minority shareholders who are being marginalized in their companies, and for companies who face the threat of minority shareholder action.
Shareholders litigation has a focus on pre-trial activity. Cases can have intense discovery demands and the case rarely goes to trial.
If you're unsure of how the contract management process works, it's important to understand the basics. Every corporation has some form of contract management processes. We begin by auditing your existing process. If possible, we optimize your existing processes and optimise it to cause the least disruption.
There's the early stages or pre-award phase. This is all the work that takes place prior to a contract being given to someone, whether it be a business or an employee. The middle stage is when the process is awarded. This includes all the paperwork to make the agreement final. Third, there's the post-award stage. This is where a lot of contract management and maintenance comes in.
First, we categorize your contracts based on their strategic and financial significance. For each contract, we fully document aspects that will cost and aspects that compensate.
We define the contract responsibilities. Who is in charge of the contract creation, the contract approval, the storage/archiving/reporting, renewal, and destruction of contracts?
"According to a survey conducted by The Global Contract Management Association, companies lose on average 20% of the value expected from a contract, 12% on hard leakage (e.g. invoicing errors and price adjustments), and 8% on soft leakage (eg. delivery failures, poor experience)."
There is no prescribed list of actions or omissions that, by definition, amount to unfair prejudice. Both prejudice and unfairness must be evidenced. We take cognizance of the facts and circumstances of each case, establishing and evidencing the conduct complained.
- corporate control and shareholder rights disputes.
Common causes for Shareholder Litigation
Minority shareholders may pursue litigation in instances such as:
- not being invited to general meetings or otherwise being squeezed out of management anticipation
- dilutive allotments of share for no discernible purpose or
- failure to consult or to provide information;
- management’s misappropriation of company business or assets;
- mismanagement of internal company affairs; and
- failure to pay reasonable dividends.
Contracts must be stored in one place, have one copy, quick retrieval and limited-time retention after project closure.
IACCM research indicates that, on average, good contract development and management could improve a company’s profitability by the equivalent of over 9% of annual revenue.
+971 56 705 8483
Areas of Contract Management
A complex area, and shareholders and potential claimants need to consider the facts of any particular case carefully. The facts and circumstances of the case will always prescribe the choice of action which an aggrieved shareholder may bring.
The Force Majeure Excuse: A history Recent Posts Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on linkedin (a) Unpredictability If the event could be foreseen at the time of entering into the contract, it should have been provided for
Parties arbitration agreement with each other is their key to having efficient arbitration proceedings. Expensive arbitration is largely caused by the parties’ (inadvertent) consent. The key to cost-effective arbitration The arbitration procedure is prescribed by consent. There
Expert Evidence in International Arbitration In every arbitration proceeding, there are specific issues in dispute, out of which the parties’ claims arise. Both parties will have conflicting answers to those issues, and thus, they will provide contradictory evidence